Court order forcing Greenpeace to pay $660m over pipeline protests will have 'chilling' impact on free speech, campaigners ...

Energy Transfer claimed in a lawsuit that Greenpeace was responsible for defamation, disruption and property damage for ...

The environmental group had said the lawsuit, over its role in a protest movement, could mean an end to its operations in the ...

(The Center Square) – Eight years after the completion of the Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL) and accompanying protests at the ...

Experts called the verdict “beyond punitive.” The organization plans to appeal and has already filed a countersuit in Europe.

Last week, a jury ruled that Greenpeace, a left-wing environmental activist group, must pay more than $660 million to Energy ...

On Wednesday, a nine-person jury in North Dakota awarded more than $660 million in damages to Energy Transfer and its ...

A North Dakota jury this week found Greenpeace liable for defamation, conspiracy and other claims over its participation in ...

How SLAPP lawsuits like the one by Energy Transfer against Greenpeace for protesting the Dakota Access Pipeline will impact ...

James B. Meigs noted that this lawsuit is the 'first major success in exposing and penalizing the putatively legitimate ...

Energy Transfer also alleges that through defamation, Greenpeace pressured nearly half of the pipeline’s investors to withdraw or reduce their support for the project. Greenpeace maintains that ...

Greenpeace must pay $660 million to Texas-based Energy Transfer Partners and subsidiary Dakota Access LLC for inciting ...