(The Center Square) – Eight years after the completion of the Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL) and accompanying protests at the ...
11don MSN
Energy Transfer claimed in a lawsuit that Greenpeace was responsible for defamation, disruption and property damage for ...
Court order forcing Greenpeace to pay $660m over pipeline protests will have 'chilling' impact on free speech, campaigners ...
Experts called the verdict “beyond punitive.” The organization plans to appeal and has already filed a countersuit in Europe.
A North Dakota jury awarded $667 million in damages to Energy Transfer, the company that runs the Dakota Access Pipeline, ...
11don MSN
A nine-person jury in Mandan, North Dakota, awarded Energy Transfer about $300 million in damages from Greenpeace after the ...
1 TRESPASS TO LAND Did Defendants trespass on Energy Transfer's land? 1. Greenpeace Inc. Greenpeace Fund Greenpeace International Х YES NO YES Х NO X YES NO If you answered YES as to any of the ...
6don MSNOpinion
If the verdict stands, Greenpeace will have to pay $667 million in damages to Energy Transfer, which built and owns the ...
On Wednesday, a nine-person jury in North Dakota awarded more than $660 million in damages to Energy Transfer and its ...
Greenpeace vowed to appeal a North Dakota jury's ruling forcing it to pay $660 million in damages for its protest efforts ...
Energy Transfer also alleges that through defamation, Greenpeace pressured nearly half of the pipeline’s investors to withdraw or reduce their support for the project. Greenpeace maintains that ...
Greenpeace must pay $660 million to Texas-based Energy Transfer Partners and subsidiary Dakota Access LLC for inciting ...
Results that may be inaccessible to you are currently showing.
Hide inaccessible results