North Dakota court ordering Greenpeace to pay $660m over pipeline protests will have 'chilling' impact on free speech and ...
A pipeline company’s lawsuit against the environmental group could chill free speech, experts said. First Amendment issues ...
11hOpinion
The Nation on MSNFossil Fuel Companies Are Silencing Us AllOn March 19, three entities from the global environmental nonprofit Greenpeace were found liable for $667 million in damages ...
A jury in North Dakota has ordered Greenpeace to pay more than $660 million for its role in protests against the ...
Greenpeace’s 2016 and 2017 protest campaign against Energy Transfer’s Dakota Access Pipeline was one of the group’s most ...
The North Dakota jury also supported Energy Transfer’s claims that Greenpeace defamed the company in its public statements about the project and illegally interfered with the company’s relationship ...
In a significant legal development, a North Dakota jury has ruled that Greenpeace is liable for hundreds of millions of dollars in damages to the pipeline company Energy Transfer. This landmark ...
Still, “it’s not a secret that we don’t have $660 million.” It’s also not a secret that the Supreme Court for a heavily ...
Greenpeace has denounced the trial as an attack on their fundamental rights to free speech and peaceful protest, a sentiment echoed by various constitutional rights experts. They warned that the ...
Last week, a jury ruled that Greenpeace, a left-wing environmental activist group, must pay more than $660 million to Energy ...
A North Dakota court also recently ruled that Greenpeace USA was liable for over $660 million in damages against Energy Transfer for the Dakota Access Pipeline protests. That verdict could ...
Energy Transfer (NYSE: ET), one of the largest midstream companies in the U.S. with over 125,000 miles of pipeline across 44 states, went public at a split-adjusted price of $5.50 per unit on Feb ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results