Court order forcing Greenpeace to pay $660m over pipeline protests will have 'chilling' impact on free speech, campaigners ...

A pipeline company’s lawsuit against the environmental group could chill free speech, experts said. First Amendment issues ...

Energy Transfer (NYSE: ET), one of the largest midstream companies in the U.S. with over 125,000 miles of pipeline across 44 ...

On March 19, three entities from the global environmental nonprofit Greenpeace were found liable for $667 million in damages ...

Greenpeace’s 2016 and 2017 protest campaign against Energy Transfer’s Dakota Access Pipeline was one of the group’s most ...

In 2017, Energy Transfer first sought legal action against Greenpeace and other environmental rights organizations involved in the protests, with a lawsuit based on defamation and racketeering claims.

1 TRESPASS TO LAND Did Defendants trespass on Energy Transfer's land? 1. Greenpeace Inc. Greenpeace Fund Greenpeace International Х YES NO YES Х NO X YES NO If you answered YES as to any of the ...

Energy Transfer, one of the largest pipeline companies ... The jury agreed and ordered Greenpeace to pay $667 million in damages. Greenpeace, which had said it would have to declare bankruptcy ...

Energy Transfer’s suit against Greenpeace represents the first major success in exposing and penalizing the putatively legitimate nonprofits that funnel money and material support to the lawbreakers ...

The energy industry is increasingly pushing back against climate activists, with recent court victories for Shell, Exxon, and ...

Last week, a jury ruled that Greenpeace, a left-wing environmental activist group, must pay more than $660 million to Energy ...

In a landmark decision that has sparked significant debate regarding free speech and environmental activism, a jury in North Dakota has ordered Greenpeace to pay over $660 million in damages to Energy ...