North Dakota has become the first state to enact a law that could shield the maker of the popular Roundup brand of weedkiller ...

A U.S. district court judge ruled Wednesday that the state of North Dakota is entitled to nearly $28M from the federal ...

Last month, a jury in North Dakota found Greenpeace liable for defamation, trespass and nuisance against Energy Transfer, the ...

A federal judge on Wednesday found the U.S. government liable to the state of North Dakota for more than $28 million in the ...

Greenpeace’s 2016 and 2017 protest campaign against Energy Transfer’s Dakota Access Pipeline was one of the group’s most celebrated and ...

A jury in North Dakota ordered Greenpeace to pay more than $660 million in damages to Energy Transfer, the company behind the Dakota Access Pipeline. Energy Transfer sued Greenpeace in 2019 ...

Most states (not North Dakota) have banned these types of lawsuits. This suit is intended to shut down allies to Native people and Water Protectors. And it’s intended to shut down Greenpeace.

In March 2025, a North Dakota jury found Greenpeace liable for about $660 million resulting from the protest. "Our lawsuit is about recovering damages for the harm Greenpeace caused our company.

Greenpeace Inc. Greenpeace Fund Greenpeace ... through their tribal land and waters that would carry oil from North Dakota's fracking fields to Illinois." Statement 8: "For months, the Standing ...

Sign up for the Slatest to get the most insightful analysis, criticism, and advice out there, delivered to your inbox daily. In the early months of the first Trump ...

AP Greenpeace backed radical protesters who tried to block a North Dakota pipeline. Now the pipeline company has won huge damages in a lawsuit against the iconic NGO. Other nonprofits should take ...

In its lawsuit, Energy Transfer Partners accused three Greenpeace entities — two in the U.S. and one based in Amsterdam — of violating North Dakota trespassing and defamation laws, and of ...