The justices stated that under federal law, there is no distinction between “discrimination” and “reverse discrimination.” It’s all illegal and subject to the same standards.

New Jersey must take action to enshrine its own protections against disparate impact discrimination through the state ...

The Calcutta High Court reserved judgment on a petition challenging a West Bengal government scheme to provide temporary ...

The justices could rule soon to limit district court judges' ability to issue orders that apply nationwide — with major ...

Nicole Santa Cruz, ProPublica, and Dave Biscobing, ABC15 Arizona ProPublica is a nonprofit newsroom that investigates abuses of power. Sign up for Dispatches, a newsletter that spotlights wrongdoing ...

Maybe I’m jaded after more than 30 years of news reporting, but I just assume you’re recording me, and I’m recording you. Perhaps I’m paranoid, but I’ve had the public deconstruct my emailed responses ...

The Supreme Court rightly held that straight white people do not need to meet a higher burden in court when suing for discrimination.

Letters: Sleight-of-hand trick bad for Ohio. No one above the law. Trump has already "changed' Columbus for better. Ohioans ...

The dueling narratives come as the administration is asking an appeals court to preserve a set of tariffs recently deemed to ...

A unanimous Supreme Court made it easier Thursday to bring lawsuits over so-called reverse discrimination, sidin ...

Kilmar Abrego Garcia appeared in a Tennessee courtroom Friday, hours after he was brought back to the U.S. to face charges of ...

A slew of Supreme Court decisions this summer will have far-reaching consequences. NPR's Ayesha Rascoe speaks with Leah Litman, law professor at the University of Michigan, about what to expect.