The justices stated that under federal law, there is no distinction between “discrimination” and “reverse discrimination.” It’s all illegal and subject to the same standards.

New Jersey must take action to enshrine its own protections against disparate impact discrimination through the state ...

The Calcutta High Court reserved judgment on a petition challenging a West Bengal government scheme to provide temporary ...

After a lengthy litigation process, the NCAA has agreed to provide US$2.8 billion in back pay to former and current college athletes, while allowing schools to directly pay athletes for the first time ...

Nicole Santa Cruz, ProPublica, and Dave Biscobing, ABC15 Arizona ProPublica is a nonprofit newsroom that investigates abuses of power. Sign up for Dispatches, a newsletter that spotlights wrongdoing ...

Maybe I’m jaded after more than 30 years of news reporting, but I just assume you’re recording me, and I’m recording you. Perhaps I’m paranoid, but I’ve had the public deconstruct my emailed responses ...

The Supreme Court rightly held that straight white people do not need to meet a higher burden in court when suing for discrimination.

Despite securing an important court victory against the Administration, the Illinois businessman Rick Woldenberg knows that ...

The dueling narratives come as the administration is asking an appeals court to preserve a set of tariffs recently deemed to ...

A unanimous Supreme Court made it easier Thursday to bring lawsuits over so-called reverse discrimination, sidin ...

Kilmar Abrego Garcia appeared in a Tennessee courtroom Friday, hours after he was brought back to the U.S. to face charges of ...

From her book’s description: “In a country obsessed with blind loyalty to a two-party democratic system, Karine Jean-Pierre, ...