News
The justices stated that under federal law, there is no distinction between “discrimination” and “reverse discrimination.” It’s all illegal and subject to the same standards.
The pipeline for women of color into positions of power collapses without the protections and advocacy DEI provides. This war on "woke" is costly for America.
A unanimous Supreme Court made it easier Thursday to bring lawsuits over so-called reverse discrimination, sidin ...
US Supreme Court unanimously rules against higher burden of proof in reverse discrimination lawsuits
The US Supreme Court unanimously ruled Thursday against imposing a higher burden of proof for reverse discrimination lawsuits under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The Court reversed on a ...
The Supreme Court's three liberal justices issued three more conservative rulings on hot-button issues Thursday. Why?
Latin Times on MSN2d
Supreme Court Lowers Bar for ‘Reverse Discrimination’ Lawsuits by Majority EmployeesThe Supreme Court on Thursday sided with a straight woman in Ohio who filed a “reverse discrimination” lawsuit against her ...
Attorney Marc Brown said, "the floodgates have been let open" after the Supreme Court's ruling on reverse discrimination.
The Supreme Court ruled requirements for discrimination lawsuits do not vary based on if the plaintiff is a member of the ...
On June 5, 2025, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services in which the Plaintiff ...
On June 5, 2025, the United States Supreme Court issued its opi n ion in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services, No.
On June 5, the US Supreme Court issued a unanimous opinion settling a split among the federal appellate courts about the ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results