A pipeline company’s lawsuit against the environmental group could chill free speech, experts said. First Amendment issues ...
Greenpeace’s 2016 and 2017 protest campaign against Energy Transfer’s Dakota Access Pipeline was one of the group’s most ...
The environmental group had said the lawsuit, over its role in a protest movement, could mean an end to its operations in the ...
13don MSN
Energy Transfer claimed in a lawsuit that Greenpeace was responsible for defamation, disruption and property damage for ...
This week, a jury in North Dakota found Greenpeace liable for more than $660 million in damages to Energy Transfer, the company behind the Dakota Access Pipeline. It was a monumental verdict that ...
Experts called the verdict “beyond punitive.” The organization plans to appeal and has already filed a countersuit in Europe.
A North Dakota jury awarded $667 million in damages to Energy Transfer, the company that runs the Dakota Access Pipeline, ...
Court order forcing Greenpeace to pay $660m over pipeline protests will have 'chilling' impact on free speech, campaigners ...
13don MSN
A nine-person jury in Mandan, North Dakota, awarded Energy Transfer about $300 million in damages from Greenpeace after the ...
8don MSNOpinion
If the verdict stands, Greenpeace will have to pay $667 million in damages to Energy Transfer, which built and owns the ...
On Wednesday, a nine-person jury in North Dakota awarded more than $660 million in damages to Energy Transfer and its ...
James B. Meigs noted that this lawsuit is the 'first major success in exposing and penalizing the putatively legitimate ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results