A pipeline company’s lawsuit against the environmental group could chill free speech, experts said. First Amendment issues ...

Greenpeace’s 2016 and 2017 protest campaign against Energy Transfer’s Dakota Access Pipeline was one of the group’s most ...

Energy Transfer claimed in a lawsuit that Greenpeace was responsible for defamation, disruption and property damage for ...

The environmental group had said the lawsuit, over its role in a protest movement, could mean an end to its operations in the ...

This week, a jury in North Dakota found Greenpeace liable for more than $660 million in damages to Energy Transfer, the company behind the Dakota Access Pipeline. It was a monumental verdict that ...

If the verdict stands, Greenpeace will have to pay $667 million in damages to Energy Transfer, which built and owns the ...

A jury in North Dakota ordered Greenpeace to pay more than $660 million in damages to Energy Transfer, the company behind the ...

On Wednesday, a nine-person jury in North Dakota awarded more than $660 million in damages to Energy Transfer and its ...

Greenpeace vowed to appeal a North Dakota jury's ruling forcing it to pay $660 million in damages for its protest efforts ...

How SLAPP lawsuits like the one by Energy Transfer against Greenpeace for protesting the Dakota Access Pipeline will impact ...

A North Dakota jury has ordered Greenpeace to pay more than $660 million in connection with protests against the Dakota ...

Greenpeace must pay $660 million to Texas-based Energy Transfer Partners and subsidiary Dakota Access LLC for inciting ...