Experts called the verdict “beyond punitive.” The organization plans to appeal and has already filed a countersuit in Europe ...

Greenpeace’s 2016 and 2017 protest campaign against Energy Transfer’s Dakota Access Pipeline was one of the group’s most celebrated and ...

Energy Transfer is a midstream company that provides pipeline, storage, and terminalizing services for natural gas, natural ...

In March, a North Dakota jury ruled that Greenpeace in the USA and Greenpeace International should pay damages of over US$660 million to Energy Transfer, which filed lawsuits alleging that Greenpeace ...

In March, a North Dakota jury found against Greenpeace in a highly watched trial, ordering the environmental group to pay pipeline company Energy Transfer more than $660 million in damages. The case ...

A U.S. district court judge ruled Wednesday that the state of North Dakota is entitled to nearly $28M from the federal ...

The environmental group sticking to its principles should serve as model for activism under the second Trump administration ...

The verdict of Energy Transfer v. Greenpeace has disturbing implications for freedom of speech. But activists aren’t letting corporates shut them up. If you didn’t follow the proceedings of ...

The legal battle began in 2016 when the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe and other indigenous groups protested the construction of the Dakota Access Pipeline, which would transport 750,000 barrels of oil ...

The lawsuit, filed by Energy Transfer in 2019, accused Greenpeace of masterminding an “unlawful and violent scheme” to harm the company’s finances, employees and infrastructure and to block ...