News
Oil companies know that protest works,” said Greenpeace USA’s leader. With cleanup efforts still underway in rural North Dakota on Friday after yet another Keystone crude oil pipeline ...
In March, a North Dakota jury found against Greenpeace in a highly watched trial, ordering the environmental group to pay pipeline company Energy Transfer more than $660 million in damages. The case ...
The environmental group sticking to its principles should serve as model for activism under the second Trump administration ...
Greenpeace’s 2016 and 2017 protest campaign against Energy Transfer’s Dakota Access Pipeline was one of the group’s most ...
Experts called the verdict “beyond punitive.” The organization plans to appeal and has already filed a countersuit in Europe ...
International Rivers denounces the SLAPP ruling against Greenpeace and all attempts to silence those who speak out against ...
An energy giant’s SLAPP lawsuit threatens the right to protest. On March 19, a jury in the fossil fuel–producing state of ...
A column by Winona LaDuke, an Ojibwe writer and economist on Minnesota’s White Earth Reservation. She also is co-curator of ...
Jury Finds Greenpeace At Fault For Protest Damages, Awards Pipeline Developer More Than $660 Million
By Mary Steurer, North Dakota Monitor, northdakotamonitor.com A Morton County jury on Wednesday ordered Greenpeace to pay ...
A pipeline company’s lawsuit against the environmental group could chill free speech, experts said. First Amendment issues ...
The verdict of Energy Transfer v. Greenpeace has disturbing implications for freedom of speech. But activists aren’t letting corporates shut them up. If you didn’t follow the proceedings of ...
Dallas-based Energy Transfer and subsidiary Dakota Access had accused Netherlands-based Greenpeace International, Greenpeace USA and funding arm Greenpeace Fund Inc. of defamation, trespass ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results