Aug 15, 2025 · The legal term “arbitrary and capricious” describes a standard used by courts to review decisions, particularly those made by government agencies or officials. This standard ensures that …

While arbitrary and capricious are often used interchangeably, they have distinct meanings and implications. Arbitrary decisions are made without any rational basis, while capricious decisions are …

When a judge makes a decision without reasonable grounds or adequate consideration of the circumstances, it is said to be arbitrary and capricious and can be invalidated by an appellate court …

Explore the arbitrary and capricious legal standard in administrative law. Learn its significance, application, and impact on agency decisions and judicial reviews.

"Arbitrary and capricious" refers to decisions made without reasonable justification. This standard is crucial for appealing administrative and judicial decisions.

Given the de novo review standard by an appellate court, an agency action is considered “arbitrary and capricious if the agency offers insufficient reasons for treating similar situations differently.” Nazareth …

In the legal context, capricious is defined in Boothe v. Roofing Supply, Inc. of Monroe: “ arbitrary and capricious conduct is willful and unreasoning action without consideration or regard for the facts and …

In English, arbitrary first meant “depending upon choice or discretion” and was specifically used to indicate the sort of decision (as for punishment) left up to the expert determination of a judge rather …

Feb 8, 2025 · However, an "arbitrary and capricious" review is not always an easy bar to meet. Judges must defer to an agency's decisions and findings, unless they seem patently unreasonable.

Arbitrary and capricious means willful and unreasoning action without due consideration and in disregard of the facts, circumstances, and rights of other parties involved.